Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    The Telemedicine Challenge: Why Founders and Engineers Need 2026 Strategies Now

    August 15, 2026

    Overcoming Information Overload in 2026 Medical Research

    August 14, 2026

    The Urgent Gaps in Population Health: What Leaders Must Fix Now

    August 13, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Health Magazine
    • Home
    • Environmental Health
    • Health Technology
    • Medical Research
    • Mental Health
    • Nutrition Science
    • Pharma
    • Public Health
    • Discover
      • Daily Health Tips
      • Financial Health & Stability
      • Holistic Health & Wellness
      • Mental Health
      • Nutrition & Dietary Trends
      • Professional & Personal Growth
    • Our Mission
    Health Magazine
    Home » News » Hidden federal report finds no net health benefits from alcohol
    Public Health

    Hidden federal report finds no net health benefits from alcohol

    healthadminBy healthadminJune 9, 2026No Comments6 Mins Read
    Hidden federal report finds no net health benefits from alcohol
    Share
    Facebook Twitter Reddit Telegram Pinterest Email


    WASHINGTON — A report on the health effects of alcohol, commissioned by the federal government but unpublished under President Trump, was published Tuesday in the journal Science. The study found that even low levels of alcohol consumption can increase the risk of various illnesses and death.

    The Alcohol Consumption and Health Study began in 2023 and was conducted by the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration as part of an update to the U.S. Dietary Guidelines. However, the panel’s research quickly became embroiled in controversy, with some members of Congress and alcohol industry trade groups claiming that the scientists involved in the project had anti-alcohol leanings.

    The group’s final findings have not been made public by the Trump administration. A House Oversight Committee report in January said the report was “irreparably flawed” and recommended that the authors of the dietary guidelines ignore its conclusions. Some study authors working outside the U.S. government argue that their findings were politicized and suppressed to the detriment of powerful special interests, including the beer, wine, and liquor lobby.

    The researchers, scorned by Trump officials, submitted their review to the Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research, which published the paper, independent of SAMHSA funding. Among the findings: Even low levels of consumption, about one drink per day, increase Americans’ chances of death or serious illness.

    “These findings are not radical; they are rigorous and commercially threatening,” Robert Vincent, SAMHSA’s former associate administrator for alcohol prevention and treatment policy who helped oversee the study, said in an accompanying editorial. Vincent lost her job last year as part of deep cuts across federal health agencies.

    Emily Hilliard, a spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services, said federal officials considered alcohol research “along with the extensive scientific evidence available” when updating the nation’s dietary advice.

    New guidelines and an upturned pyramid were announced in January, surprising some as decades-old messages about alcohol were scrapped. Rather than telling Americans to stick to one or two drinks a day, they simply advised them to “reduce their alcohol intake to improve overall health.”

    “The guidelines are informed by the entirety of the scientific record, not a single report or analysis,” Hilliard told STAT. However, a scientific appendix published with the dietary guidelines noted that the agency relied on another study, rather than the SAMHSA-led report, as the basis for its alcohol recommendations.


    STAT Plus: Researchers say major report linking moderate drinking to disease will not be published

    Historically, it has been suggested that men limit drinking twice as much as women, due to biological differences in how quickly their bodies process alcohol.

    However, the available scientific evidence supports a gender-neutral recommendation to reduce the risk for men, the SAMHSA report found, limiting adults who drink to one alcoholic drink per day. Another committee developing dietary guidelines reached the same conclusion in 2020, but the proposal was not adopted.

    The science about alcohol’s health effects is especially relevant now, when Americans are drinking less and thinking more about their health, but alcohol-related harms remain at high levels. Alcohol causes an estimated 178,000 deaths each year in this country. Alcohol consumption, especially binge drinking, is associated with an increased risk of various illnesses and death.

    However, scientific opinion is divided on how small amounts of alcohol affect health. Just last week, a large review published in Nature Health found evidence that low to moderate alcohol consumption is associated with a lower risk of some cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and dementia. However, research has found that even very low levels of alcohol consumption are associated with an increased risk of cancer. The authors write that “current evidence does not support sex-specific thresholds” for federal alcohol guidance.

    The Trump administration’s decision to withhold taxpayer-funded alcohol reports has public health implications, but also raises new questions about scientific independence under the administration. Authorities are already threatening or withdrawing research funding on topics deemed illegal, such as gender diversity and racial inequality. Most recently, the administration proposed changes to the way scientific grants are awarded to give political appointees greater control over federally funded research.

    “The public health consequences of setting aside evidence-based alcohol policy are immediate and cumulative,” Vincent wrote in an editorial.

    In the end, Trump officials relied on a study on alcohol led by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at the request of Congress. That review by 14 external researchers found moderate evidence that moderate drinking is associated with lower all-cause mortality. The group’s analysis was not specific to alcohol-related causes of death. The review also found that moderate drinking increases the risk of breast cancer. (NASEM’s committee was criticized by watchdog groups and outside researchers for including people with financial ties to the beverage alcohol industry.)

    In contrast, the SAMHSA committee found that alcohol has no net health benefits and carries risks even in moderate amounts. One drink a day is “associated with an increased risk of death from liver cirrhosis, esophageal cancer, oral cavity cancer, and trauma-related death. For women, these risks extend to liver cancer,” the paper says.

    Researchers used meta-analysis and data modeling to estimate alcohol-specific risks for various diseases and injuries and compared those risks to those of people who have never drank alcohol. (Former drinkers were excluded to control for potential bias in people who stopped drinking after getting sick.) The study focused on U.S. data that was representative of the national population, including from surveys, the Injury Surveillance System, and the Vital Statistics Repository.


    STAT Plus: Alcohol is wreaking havoc on public health in the United States. American society turns a blind eye

    The lifetime risk of death from one drink a day is about 1 in 1,000, but increases with the amount of alcohol consumed. Data shows that if a man drinks 14 drinks a week, he has a 1 in 25 chance of dying from alcohol over his lifetime. Women’s risk increases sharply as they drink more: At two drinks a day, women’s relative risk of dying from serious liver disease is more than double that of men who drink the same amount, the analysis found.

    The small protective effect researchers observed with up to three drinks per week was not statistically significant. However, the researchers found that women who drank up to one alcoholic drink per day had a reduced risk of diabetes, a finding echoed in other studies, but said the risk was “not evenly distributed across individuals.”

    Binge drinking, defined as five or more drinks at one time for men and four or more for women, increases the risk of heart attack, heart disease, stroke and injury, the study found.

    STAT’s chronic health coverage is supported by a grant from. bloomberg philanthropy. our financial supporter It has no role in any of our journalism decisions.



    Source link

    Visited 15 times, 1 visit(s) today
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Telegram Reddit Email
    Previous ArticleSugar-sweetened beverage taxes gain momentum around the world
    Next Article Study explains why walking becomes slower and more tiring as we age
    healthadmin

    Related Posts

    The Urgent Gaps in Population Health: What Leaders Must Fix Now

    August 13, 2026

    Senate committee backs CDC director and pandemic response nominee

    July 30, 2026

    Federal judge refuses to suspend Medicaid work requirement for now

    July 30, 2026

    FTC, His and Hers, Ebola Vaccine: Morning Round

    July 30, 2026

    Healthy until you’re sick: Medicaid work rules threaten patient care

    July 30, 2026

    Addressing Rising Health Threats: What Epidemiologists and Officials Must Know Now

    July 29, 2026
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Categories

    • Daily Health Tips
    • Discover
    • Environmental Health
    • Exercise & Fitness
    • Featured
    • Featured Videos
    • Financial Health & Stability
    • Fitness
    • Fitness Updates
    • Health
    • Health Technology
    • Healthy Aging
    • Healthy Living
    • Holistic Healing
    • Holistic Health & Wellness
    • Medical Research
    • Medical Research & Insights
    • Mental Health
    • Mental Wellness
    • Natural Remedies
    • New Workouts
    • Nutrition
    • Nutrition & Dietary Trends
    • Nutrition & Superfoods
    • Nutrition Science
    • Pharma
    • Preventive Healthcare
    • Professional & Personal Growth
    • Public Health
    • Public Health & Awareness
    • Selected
    • Sleep & Recovery
    • Top Programs
    • Weight Management
    • Workouts
    Popular Posts
    • 1773313737_bacteria_-_Sebastian_Kaulitzki_46826fb7971649bfaca04a9b4cef3309-620x480.jpgHow Sino Biological ProPure™ redefines ultra-low… March 12, 2026
    • pexels-david-bartus-442116The food industry needs to act now to cut greenhouse… January 2, 2022
    • 1773729862_TagImage-3347-458389964760995353448-620x480.jpgDespite safety concerns, parents underestimate the… March 17, 2026
    • 1774403998_image_28620e4b6b0047f7ab9154b41d739db1-620x480.jpgGait pattern helps distinguish between Lewy body… March 24, 2026
    • 1773209206_futuristic_techno_design_on_background_of_supercomputer_data_center_-_Image_-_Timofeev_Vladimir_M1_4.jpegMulti-agent AI systems outperform single models… March 11, 2026
    • Leukemia-620x480.jpgBiomimetic platform powers CAR T therapy for… March 9, 2026

    Demo
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss

    The Telemedicine Challenge: Why Founders and Engineers Need 2026 Strategies Now

    By healthadminAugust 15, 2026

    Health tech founders and engineers must prepare 2026 strategies for telemedicine growth, reimbursement risks, AI diagnostics, and wearable tech integration.

    Overcoming Information Overload in 2026 Medical Research

    August 14, 2026

    The Urgent Gaps in Population Health: What Leaders Must Fix Now

    August 13, 2026

    The Growing Challenge of Treatment-Resistant Depression for Clinicians and Policymakers

    August 12, 2026

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    HealthxMagazine
    HealthxMagazine

    At HealthX Magazine, we are dedicated to empowering entrepreneurs, doctors, chiropractors, healthcare professionals, personal trainers, executives, thought leaders, and anyone striving for optimal health.

    Our Picks

    The Growing Challenge of Treatment-Resistant Depression for Clinicians and Policymakers

    August 12, 2026

    The Core Problem with 2025-2030 DGAs for Clinical Practice

    August 11, 2026

    The Urgent Health Risks from Climate Change and Pollution

    August 10, 2026
    New Comments
      Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
      • Home
      • Privacy Policy
      • Our Mission
      © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.